Witness Pics, My Comic and The Field
  • Daily
  • Comic
  • Field
  • Book

Theory?

6/13/2014

 
An Addict's Story

Don't let this happen to you!!!

It started out innocently enough. I began to think at parties now and then - to loosen up. Inevitably, though, one thought led to another, and soon I was more than just a social thinker.

I began to think alone - "to relax," I told myself - but I knew it wasn't true. Thinking became more and more important to me, and finally I was thinking all the time.

That was when things began to sour at home. One evening I had turned off the TV and asked my wife about the meaning of life. She spent that night at her mother's.

I began to think on the job. I knew that thinking and employment don't mix, but I couldn't stop myself.

I began to avoid friends at lunchtime so I could read Thoreau and Kafka. I would return to the office dizzied and confused, asking, "What is it exactly we are doing here?"

One day the boss called me in. He said, "Listen, I like you, and it hurts me to say this, but your thinking has become a real problem. If you don't stop thinking on the job, you'll have to find another job." This gave me a lot to think about.

I came home early after my conversation with the boss. "Honey," I confessed, "I've been thinking..."

"I know you've been thinking," she said, "and I want a divorce!"

"But Honey, surely it's not that serious."

"It is serious," she said, lower lip aquiver. "You think as much as college professors, and college professors don't make any money, so if you keep on thinking, we won't have any money!"

"That's a faulty syllogism," I said impatiently. She exploded in tears of rage and frustration, but I was in no mood to deal with the emotional drama.

"I'm going to the library," I snarled as I stomped out the door. I headed for the library, in the mood for some Nietzsche. I roared into the parking lot with NPR on the radio and ran up to the big glass doors ... They didn't open. The library was closed.

To this day, I believe that a Higher Power was looking out for me that night. Leaning on the unfeeling glass, whimpering for Zarathustra, a poster caught my eye, "Friend, is heavy thinking ruining your life?" it asked. You probably recognize that line. It comes from the standard Thinker's Anonymous poster.

Which is why I am what I am today: a recovering thinker.

I never miss a TA meeting. At each meeting we watch a non-educational video; last week it was "Porky's." Then we share experiences about how we avoided thinking since the last meeting.

I still have my job, and things are a lot better at home. Life just seemed ... easier, somehow, as soon as I stopped thinking. I think the road to recovery is nearly complete for me.

*.*

Never hit a man when he's down . . . kick him, it's easier.

*.*

What interesting property do these words have in common: 

body  day  how  one  place  thing  time  what  where?

Each forms a new word when appended to the word "some."

*.*

"Say," said the smooth operator in a confidential tone to the host of the party, "there's a lot of hot babes at this party.  If I find one that's ready to grab a quick one, would you mind if I used your extra bedroom?"

"What about your wife?"

"Oh, I won't be gone that long.  She'll never miss me."

"No, I'm sure she won't miss you," smirked the host, "but fifteen minutes ago.  She borrowed the extra bedroom."

*.*

Definitions and cool meanings

Cigarette: A pinch of tobacco rolled in paper with fire at one end and a fool at the other.

Love affairs: Something like cricket where one-day internationals are more popular than a five day test.

Lecture: The art of transferring information from the notes of the lecturer to the notes of the students without passing through "the minds of either".

Conference: The confusion of one man multiplied by the number present.

Compromise: The art of dividing a cake in such a way that each person believes he got the biggest piece.

Tears: The hydraulic force by which masculine willpower is defeated by feminine water-power.

Conference Room: A place where everybody talks, nobody listens & everybody disagrees on later.

Classic: A book which people praise, but do not read.

Office: A place where you can relax after your strenuous home life.

Yawn: The only time some married men ever get to open their mouths.

Etc.: A sign to make others believe that you know more than you actually do.

Committee: Individuals who can do nothing individually and sit to decide that nothing can be done together.

Experience: The name men give to their mistakes.

Philosopher: A fool who torments himself during life, to be spoken of when dead.

Opportunist: A person who starts taking a bath if he accidentally falls into a river.

Optimist: A person who, while falling from the Eiffel Tower, says midway, "See? I am not injured yet."

Pessimist: A person who says that O is the last letter in ZERO, instead of the first letter in OPPORTUNITY.

Boss: Someone who is early when you are late and late when you are early.

Politician: One who shakes your hand before elections and your confidence afterwards.

Issue of the Times;
Tony Gibson’s Theory of School Violence By Michael S. Rozeff   

Hamilton Bertie “Tony” Gibson (1914-2001) was a British anarchist, conscientious objector (for which he was imprisoned) and psychologist. Gibson wrote Youth for Freedom (1951), a provocative pamphlet. From this work, we may extract a theory that explains school violence, which is a worldwide phenomenon and not uniquely American. Being worldwide, youth violence cannot be explained by the means of violence used, be they guns, clubs, knives, rocks, spears, fire, or whatever.

The theory can be partly stated as follows. Children have certain behaviors that come naturally to them, instinctively one might say. If they are allowed to have a childhood that lets them vent and live through these instincts, they will develop into adults who are not unusually aggressive. But if adults make the child live in ways that go too much against these natural instincts, then the child retains its asocial and ferocious instincts into adult life, rather than living through them as a childhood stage of development. Adults then look adult and act adult but retain child instincts and behavior. As he says “The nice young men who lightheartedly fly bombers and devastate towns are simply neurotic beings who have had to wait until their twenties to give proper expression to the instincts of infancy.” Later he writes “The children who grow up with a satisfactory gratification of their instinctual life in the various phases of their development are more likely to have sound adult instincts at a comparatively early age and therefore resist the fantastic demands of the State in the matter of military service.”

The more that a culture (mainly through public schools) anywhere in the world attempts to suppress mildly aggressive or simply physical behaviors that are peculiar to children and make them behave in adult ways that restrict them too greatly, the more likely we are to observe extremes of aggression breaking out and the more that aggressive instincts will be nurtured in adults. Giving drugs to children to suppress their activities and tendencies will tend to produce a greater tendency toward excessive violence, not simply or only by the physical aspects of the drugs but also by psychological reactions to the behavior control. The same outcome will come about by preventing boys from being boys, over-controlling rough and tumble play, overly suppressing taunts, fights, shoves, pushes, and rough sports. Children need the freedom to play with other children, to shout, to roughneck, and to play all kinds of games. They need the freedom to roam around on their own. They shouldn’t be prevented from learning how to shoot rifles or bows and arrows, if this appeals to them. Vicarious video game experiences may or may not provide adequate substitutes for play; I suspect that they do not in general do so.

The basis of this theory is Gibson’s observation that children are weaker than adults, and that to survive as weak beings under the thumbs of adults, they have behaviors peculiar to being children. “The child is a gregarious but not a truly social animal; when in mental and physical health, it is aggressive to the point of ferocity and capable of a ruthlessness which normal adults do not possess. It is entirely self-centered, and its love for other persons is of an essentially different nature from the affection which an adult may feel for another person.”

Aggression in adults and therefore approval of the State’s aggressions is, according to this theory, fostered by social systems and adults that overly control children. Since public schools exercise such control, they produce more adults who support the State, not simply or only by indoctrination or false history but by psychological means that make people comfortable with violent aggression and immorality.

“The well-meaning social moralists who bring up children according to an idealized adult code of behavior have to bear their full share of the blame for the supreme immorality of adult behavior.”

“The State in its drive towards totalitarian dominion assumes more and more the aspect of a hypocritical and repressive adult controlling a lot of children. In all the aspects of State interference with individual liberty we see the nasty schoolmarm, the pompous father.”

Guns do not explain youth and school violence because it is worldwide and doesn’t always involve guns. There are other theories than Gibson’s that attempt to explain school violence. There are theories that directly challenge Gibson, arguing that childhood aggression is not a playful thing that children grow out of. They argue that aggression is learned and therefore must be countered or suppressed in one way or another by adults. But if this is true, why are Americans and others experiencing even greater school violence as the attempts to suppress it are heightened?

I think Gibson’s theory has merit. If we are observing greater school violence, it is at the same time that we observe society constricting the schools, enforcing more and more rules, attempting to feminize boys, and going to extremes to suppress even mildly aggressive, even verbal, behavior. We see greater amounts of drugs being administered to children to dampen them down. This is tending to prevent normal childhood development. In the vain quest of reducing person-on-person violence, it is enhancing it. Not only that, it is producing adults who are comfortable with high amounts of State-inflicted violence and aggression.

Quote of the Times;
As the Romans knew, if you're not going to colonize a conquered territory, the correct strategy is to go in hard, break things and kill people, then immediately leave.  Repeat as needed.

Link of the Times;
http://www.unz.com/isteve/a-terrific-graph/

Subscribe or Submit to the Internet's elite source;

Send E-mail to efreem2@alumni.umbc.edu

to complement The Field!

Or

Follow me on Twitter: @aod318

Reported?

6/6/2014

 
Saw on a local news network last night:

Liberals promise to promise less.

"Huh?" on so many levels.

*.*

On their 40th wedding anniversary and during the banquet celebrating it, Tom was asked to give his friends a brief account of the benefits of a marriage of such long duration. 

"Tell us Tom, just what is it you have learned from all those wonderful years with your wife?" 

Tom responds, "Well, I've learned that marriage is the best teacher of all. It teaches you loyalty, forbearance, meekness, self-restraint, forgiveness and a great many other qualities you wouldn't have needed if you'd stayed single." 

*.*

Navy’s Outbreak of Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea Traced to Single Bar Hog

SAN DIEGO, CA - Navy health officials say the person behind a health crisis that has resulted in thousands of sick sailors, weeks of lost working hours, and over $3 million in medical expenses is a Chula Vista mother of four, high school dropout, and Del Taco employee.

Navy brass is now scrambling to keep sailors away from bar hog Tiffany McCarthey, 24, a carrier of drug-resistant gonorrhea that has spread to sailors all throughout the fleet.

“It’s all been a fucking wild ride,” McCarthey said. “I feel like a celebrity. In the last month, I got free health care by the military, my picture’s been passed around all over base, and now I’m gonna be in the newspaper.”

McCarthey said the attention is especially gratifying considering that her stepfather once said “she’d never amount to nothing.”

Earlier this year, sailors began contracting gonorrhea that was resistant to drugs, even Suprax, the “last line of defense” that doctors typically use when all other antibiotics fail. By the 15th of last month, over 8,000 sailors have fallen ill.

Captain Wayne Harangozo, a Navy epidemiologist at Walter Reed Medical Center, began a frantic health investigation.

“I knew this was serious right way,” Harangozo said. “The Navy is no stranger to gonorrhea. It does, after all, make port calls in Phuket. But this was different.”

Harangozo flew out to Navy bases around the world, struggling to find out what could be causing this epidemic.

After weeks of dead ends, Harangozo finally had his “Eureka!” moment.

“The first batch of sick sailors had spent time at the Trophy Lounge,” Harangozo said, referring to a bar in National City, Calif., not far from Naval Base San Diego. “And they all mentioned the same girl by name.”

Harangozo drove down to the Trophy Lounge and asked the bartender for someone named “Tiff.” The bartender pointed to McCarthey down at the end of the bar, drinking a beer alone and scanning the room. Years of weight gain had stretched and distorted her lower back tattoo, which was peeking out beneath her midriff shirt.

When Harangozo walked up to McCarthey, a regular at Trophy Lounge for years, she asked him, “What rank are you?”

“I just want to talk,” Harangozo replied.

“Oh, a romantic type,” she said.

Harangozo cleared up the misunderstanding and took McCarthey to be examined. The diagnosis: super gonorrhea.

“Tiff’s all right,” said Machinist’s Mate First Class Brian Salmon. “Some girls you take home to Mama. Some girls you take to your car in the parking lot and when you’re done tell ‘em you’re going to Denny’s now, so she needs to get out of your car.”

“Tiff’s that second type of girl,” Salmon said.

Harangozo estimated that McCarthey has slept with over 70 sailors since the start of the year, a figure McCarthey finds insultingly low.

“Try 700, asshole,” McCarthey said. “It’s like that doctor thinks I can’t get guys or something, like he’s better than me or something.”

Naval Base San Diego officials have added McCarthey’s vagina to the list of locations that are off-limits for sailors, a measure that Harangozo fears is too little, too late.

“Unfortunately, everything I know about sailors tells me that they will still be having sex with this woman and putting themselves and the Navy at risk,” Harangozo said.

“Hopefully,” he added, “they remember to wear a condom. Or a Hazmat suit.”

*.*

Unscientific Urban Legends

Cabbage patch kids are nuclear mutants

Myth: The toys were orders by the US government to prepare us for life post-nuclear holocaust.

Truth: If they were to prepare us for anything, it's the modern obesity epidemic.

NASA's expensive space pen

Myth: NASA spent $$$ developing a pen that could write in space. The Russians used a pencil.

Truth: Both the Americans and the Russians used pencils, until someone designed a space pen.

Smile to save energy

Myth: It takes 43 muscles to frown but only 17 to smile. Smiling saves energy.

Truth: It depends on the type of frown, the sincerity of smile and the pendantry of the researcher.

KFC's mutant meat

Myth: Kentucky Fried Chicken changed to KFC because their chickens were mutants.

Truth: Mutant chickens? Really? Oh come off it, only MacDonalds use those.

Blondes face extinction

Myth: Blondes are slowly going extinct and the last one will die out in Finland in 200 years.

Truth: You're telling me there isn't a preference for blondes. Get back to your lab, freak boy.

Lemming suicides

Myth: Lemmings leap to their deaths from cliffs in mass fits of suicidal fervour.

Truth: It was Disney. They made them jump. They pushed them off a cliff on camera. Bastards.

Wasted brains

Myth: 90% of our brains go unused, sitting dormant until we get consciousness expansion.

Truth: If you only use 10% of your brain then you're an idiot. In more ways than one.

*.*

Whoever stole my copy of Microsoft Office, I will track you down.  You have my Word.

Issue of the Times;
Why Isn't This Reported? by Karl Denninger 

Gee, why isn't this all over the mainstream media?

On May 10th 2014, a 34-year-old man named Fadi Qandil went to the Central mall parking lot in Ft. Smith, Arkansas to confront his estranged wife Tabitha while she was on her way to see a movie with two other people; 23 year old Grayson Herrera, and 27 year old Dustin O’Connor.  According to witnesses, Qandil approached the party and told them that he had a gun. He then raised his shirt to display a firearm tucked into his waistband. When he went to reach for his firearm, both Herrera and O’Connor, who are licensed to carry a concealed firearm in their state, drew their firearms and fired at Qandil.

Herrera suffered a non-life threatening wound, while Qandil was hit with multiple shots and pronounced dead at the scene by first responders.

So let's see what we have here.

A bad guy shows up and commits felonious assault with a deadly weapon and attempts to shoot a bunch of people (probably at least his estranged wife and likely those who she was with.)

Before he can complete that act, however, he is stopped in the commission of his felony by two other citizens carrying concealed guns.

Both of the civilians fire several shots between them and none of those bullets strike anything other than the intended target.

Now contrast this with the common "police response" to such an event, where (1) the cops show up only after the alleged assailant has completed at least one felonious act and injured or killed at least one innocent person and (2) they typically either don't shoot at all (because they're too late and the felon has already killed himself, having completed what he intended to do) or they shoot while exhibiting poor marksmanship, often injuring innocent people and/or damaging property.

You would think that this instance, where the only person who got shot was the bad guy, would get boatloads of press.  After all, it bleeds, therefore it should lead, right?

Ah, probably not.  See, this incident shows with decisive clarity the superiority of citizens being individually armed over reliance on the government.

  • The citizens involved were demonstrably better shots, and displayed better targeting discipline, than most law enforcement officers do under similar circumstances.

    AND
  • The citizens, due to the fact that they were present at the time of the assault and the police were not, effectively ended the assault before any innocent person was harmed.

    AND
  • The weapons carried by the law-abiding citizens did not, despite their presence on these persons for an extended period of time, neither injured or killed anyone other than a person who was attempting to commit a violent felony at the time he was shot in lawful self-defense.
There is only one fly in the ointment -- the story "emphasizes" the fact that the two citizens were licensed to carry firearms. 

A person's right to lawful defense of self and others, if you recognize the right to life in the first instance, requires no "license."

A license is, by definition, a granted privilege and by both any reasonable moral code as well as the Declaration of Independence's assertion of unalienable rights, recognized (but not granted) by the Second Amendment, no person need ask permission before defending themselves from a deadly assault.

Quote of the Times;
“One lives in the naïve notion that later there will be more room than in the entire past." – Canetti

Link of the Times;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2640663/From-size-24-Miss-South-Texas-How-cruel-taunts-inspired-obese-teen-lose-100lbs-pageant-queen.html

Subscribe or Submit to the Internet's elite source;

Send E-mail to efreem2@alumni.umbc.edu

to complement The Field!

Or

Follow me on Twitter: @aod318

Bandits?

6/2/2014

 
The latest toy has hit the shops - a talking Muslim doll.

Nobody knows what the hell it says, because no one has the guts to pull the cord.

*.*

HOARDS: Kenneth Epstein, 55, of Sun City Summerlin, Nev., pleaded no  contest to misdemeanor charges of failure to register a pistol, unjustifiable injury to animals, failure to have a cat fanciers license, violating the fire code, and two counts of public nuisance.  The charges stemmed from Epstein's home, which was so filled with  garbage the TV show Hoarders was considering filming an episode there.  The judge gave Epstein a suspended 358-day jail sentence, and ordered him to continue therapy, keep his home open for inspections, and take  in no pets without court approval. The city is also billing Epstein for  the cost of cleaning up his home -- $95,553.08 for removing at least 41 tons of material, including 55 cats (15 of which were dead), six refrigerators, feces, rodents, decaying foods, and contaminated portions of the building. Kristina Wildeveld, Epstein's attorney, said the court order is in the best interest of the city and her client, and is only concerned about ensuring the charges aren't inflated. "The city's goal and our goal is to see that Mr. Epstein can live a healthy, full life," Wildeveld said.

*.*

I had to call the local police this evening on a non-urgent matter. After negotiating the voice mail system, I finally found the right department and was put on hold for the next available agent. The hold music?

"Prisoner of Love".

*.*

Our local hippies are growing old.  A patch of graffiti here reads: MAKE TEA NOT WAR.

*.*

Yesterday, on my way to work, I saw a sign on the back end of a garbage truck that said "Children First".

Made me wonder...

Issue of the Times;
No, American CEOs don’t make out like bandits by Matt Palumbo

Right as the Occupy movement was taking off, a popular chart highlighted the gap between the average CEO’s pay and the average worker’s pay.

According to this image, the average CEO in the U.S. earned 475 times the average worker, while the gaps were a mere 15:1, 12:1, and 11:1 in France, Germany, and Japan respectively. PolitiFact decided to give the claim a look, and cited one study that pegged the ratio at 325:1, and another which put it at 185:1.

While PolitiFact rated this claim “false,” CEO pay in the U.S. still appears ridiculously high relative to other nations. It hardly defeats the argument the chart was trying to make that its creators overstated their case.

The high CEO-to-worker pay gap is a recent phenomenon, and the causes are still debated. One explanation that I found fascinating comes from behavioral economist Dan Ariely. In his book “Predictably Irrational” Ariely notes that the rise in CEO pay coincides with regulations that went into effect in 1993 which forced companies to disclose pay and compensation of their top executives. The intentions of these regulations were to make it harder for CEOs to “get away with” outrageous pay, so to speak.

But there are intentions and there is reality. Ariely explains, “once salaries became public information, the media regularly ran special stories ranking CEO by pay. Rather than surprising the executive perks, the publicity had CEOs in America comparing their pay with that of everyone else. In response, executive salaries skyrocketed.”

In other words, all disclosing CEO pay did was create the equivalent of a high scores list for CEOs to compete on.

Is the CEO to worker pay gap defensible? Economist Walter Williams makes the point that while people get up in arms over CEO pay, we seldom see the same over the pay of celebrities. The top ten celebrities earn an average annual salary of $100 million, while the top ten CEOs earn $43 million. Perhaps one rebuttal that could be made to Williams is that while celebrities are literally paid for performance, there’s conflicting evidence as to whether CEO’s are.

For most of my time as a student of economics, I’ve defended CEO pay at its currently high levels because it wasn’t high enough to truly be considered at the expense of workers.

Let’s take McDonald’s as an example. According to the Christian Science Monitor in 2012, McDonald’s had the highest gap between CEO pay and worker pay in the nation (though some other sources grant JC Penny with this title), with CEO Donald Thompson earning 1,196 times what the average worker earns. Thompson earns $9,247 an hour — compared to $7.73 for the average McDonald’s employee. In 2012, Thompson was compensated $13.8 million for his role as CEO.

So is it fair that Thompson earns in a single year that a McDonald’s employee would have to work nearly 900 years to earn? The answer certainly would be yes if Thompson could simply solve this problem by paying himself less, but that wouldn’t do much. McDonalds employs roughly 440,000 people (full time + part time). Even if Thompson decided to work pro bono and distribute his annual compensation among his workers, this would only translate to a $31.36 a year raise per employee – or less than a 1 cent an hour raise.

Despite everything outlined thus far, there exists a gaping flaw in the statistic that the average CEO earns 300 or so times more than the average worker. The statistic tossed around isn’t exactly measuring the pay gap between the average CEO and the average worker, it’s measuring the pay gap between the average worker and a CEO at the nation’s largest companies.

Look at the AFL-CEO’s report that the average CEO earned 331 times the average worker in 2012, and you’ll see a footnote which explains that this is an “AFL-CIO analysis of 350 available companies in the S&P 500.” When the Economic Policy Institute states that “Average CEO compensation was $14.1 million in 2012,” it adds the caveat, “using a measure of CEO pay that covers CEOs of the top 350 firms.”

I happened to notice a convenient correlation that the more liberal leaning a website was, the more likely it was to omit the fact that compensation was only measured among 350 companies in the S&P500.

How do you accurately measure “average CEO pay” by looking at the top 350 CEOs when there exist hundreds of thousands of CEOs in America? Below is listed miscellaneous statistics I’ve found on CEO pay nationwide.

  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics places the mean annual Chief Executive wage at $178,400, and the median at $171,610. Both estimates exclude benefits
  • Forbes states that 2% of CEOs in America have an annual salary above $3 million (excluding benefits), while 77% earn $500,000 or less.
  • A table in a study published in the Oxford Review of Economic Policy shows that in 2002, while CEO compensation averaged $10.3 million in S&P500 companies, it falls to $4.7 million in Mid-Cap 400 companies, and to $2.2 million in Small-Cap 600 companies.
  • Companies in the “Mid-Cap 400” category have market capitalizations from $1.2 billion to $5.1 billion, while small-cap 600 companies have market caps of $350 million to $1.6 billion. This confirms that high CEO compensation is concentrated among the nation’s largest firms, and falls drastically when we look at smaller firms.
  • Salary.com estimates median CEO compensation (salary + benefits + bonus) at $1,335,148. Without benefits of bonus, median CEO pay is estimated at $738,533.
Note that the government’s official statistics on CEO pay from the BLS contradict the estimate from Salary.com. However, with per capita income in the U.S. above $50,000, the CEO to worker pay gap in either case is far from the “300:1” claim. Using the BLS’s estimate, orthodontists out earn CEOs in America. Using Salary.com’s data, the median CEO’s compensation is roughly 26 times higher than the average worker (as per-capita income was $51,749 in 2012).

Regardless of which estimate you take as gospel, the main point still remains. The alleged CEO-to-worker pay gap is a misleading and thus meaningless statistic, measuring only CEOs of America’s top companies against the average American worker.

Quote of the Times;
“There are no new truths, but only truths that have not been recognized by those who have perceived them without noticing." – McCarthy

Link of the Times;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2640538/Is-partner-fat-lazy-Then-probably-Motivation-drops-relationship-slacker.html

Subscribe or Submit to the Internet's elite source;

Send E-mail to efreem2@alumni.umbc.edu

to complement The Field!

Or

Follow me on Twitter: @aod318

    Picture


    ​Archives

    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    RSS Feed

SOME HOTLINKS
https://www.drudgereport.com/
http://voxday.blogspot.com/​
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/​
https://www.dailywire.com/​
https://www.breitbart.com/
http://takimag.com/
https://www.straightdope.com/​
http://www.returnofkings.com/
https://www.bakadesuyo.com/​
https://therationalmale.com/
https://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/
http://gunslingersjournal.blogspot.com/​​
http://news.infogalactic.com/
http://market-ticker.org/​
https://www.lewrockwell.com/
http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/​
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/
https://www.jihadwatch.org/
https://althouse.blogspot.com/
​https://glitternight.com/
https://iotwreport.com/
​http://www.unz.com/​

    CONTACT US

Submit
GET SOCIAL
Direct contact:

efreem2@gmail.com
OUR LOCATION
Witness The Field Archives:
humor.zip
File Size: 8111 kb
File Type: zip
Download File

Picture
WARNING:
Several animals were savagely beaten in the making of this page, including but not limited to; kittens, rabbits, zebu, skunks, puppies, and platypus. Also several monkeys where force fed crack to improve their typing skills.


And someone shot a duck.

An Images & Ideas, Inc. Service.

No Vegans were harmed in the making of this site.  We're looking for a new provider.


All information contained within this page is Copyright @ 1996 I & I, Inc.

All rights reserved.Any use, without express written consent,will result in my foot up your ass!